CIVILUS DEFENDUS

Citizens’ Declaration of Threat & Plea for Relief
18 Legislative Solutions to Creeping Sharia

We citizens of the United States of America, in order to preserve for posterity the foundation of liberty bestowed upon us by our founding fathers through our Constitution, do recognize the United States to be under grave threat of invasion, domestic violence and insurrection from elements within Islam. We respectfully declare the causes which lead to this belief and register our plea for relief.

We declare:
Islam is both theological and political in nature, as revealed in generally accepted renditions of the Quran, Sira, Hadith and Islamic law known as Sharia, whose expressed ambition is to bring the world into a state of submission to ‘Allah’ and divine (Sharia) law;

Core tenets of Islam are irreconcilably in conflict with the United States Constitution, identified in part as infringements upon freedom of religion and expression, lack of equality among people and between the sexes, and sanctioned deception in dealing with non-Muslims; these precepts constitute a breach of inalienable human rights;

Political Islam’s supremacism represents a duality of existence, placing Muslims superior to non-Muslims, and endorses behaviors that can debase, harm or kill non-Muslims;

Read it all at Civilus Defendus.

And why not take a moment to ponder this bit of sorrow I found...

I recall reading about the experiences of a villager in Serbia.when the Muslims came to town. At first they offered goats, food, friendship even money. They spoke a little of their religion and the wonders thereof. Soon, as they grew in number, they demanded changes in the way things were done, accommodations—:and finally conversion. Instead of inviting them to convert, they gave them ultimatums. Convert or die. Having one's head cut off was mentioned often. I recall specifically that the story teller said, "That's when we started killing them".

Peace on the playground is achieved through superior firepower. Violence and the threats of violence—the coin of Islam.

"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf" is a quote often incorrectly attributed to George Orwell. It's author is unknown, but the point is well taken by those who are willing to acknowledge that not all men, nor women for that matter, are made with the salvo of a Mary Poppins.

We should all stand ready. Violence may visit itself upon any one of us at any time from many various and sundry ne'er do wells We can be sure those who died at the hands of the well-trained murdering jihadists in Mumbai felt quite safe and secure until the bullets started to fly. It's a comfort to know that there were enough guns sold in the US in the last 3 months to equip the standing armies of both China and India.

islam is a lie and
Truth is killing it.

STRATEGEMS OF WAR, NOT EMPATHY

An interesting point made by JSLA at Jihad Watch:

I reiterate a point I've made recently which touch on this subject of "womens' rights" within Islam:

Focusing on the way Islam victimizes women (or anyone else) is a slippery slope. Yes—speak out on it—the vileness of Islam in all its dimensions needs revealing badly—but buying into the victimology cult of Islam, and especially pitying or crying over the way Muslims victimizes themselves will accomplish nothing. Not only does this play into their Islamic victim-pimping culture, but tacit within this approach is an expectation that Muslims ever will rectify or reform these heinous abusive aspects of Islam if only we point them out...

It will never happen.

I believe we should stress the sinister aspects of such stories as " forced marriages" mainly with a focus on how it harms us and our society - not how it harms the Muslims. The damage Islam wreaks on Muslims is their affair, and their fault, and as it is not our job, as it must NEVER become our impossible job to be the reformers of Islam—it is also not our part to be the mourners for the myriad ways Muslims foul the world and themselves by perpetuating the barbarity of Islam.

Our moral suasion has proven completely inneffective with them. Muslim "morality", such as it is, is immune to our sensibilites. Muslims can and should be shamed for the horribleness of Islam. But Muslims never will be shamed into changing their vile beliefs. Islam seems singularly designed to strengthen in proportion to the suffering and horribleness it inflicts. S

haming Islam and Muslims should have one purpose, and one purpose only: to subvert their arrogant adherence to Islam, and to shatter Muslim confidence in Islam. The nasty inumerable failures of Islam must be shoved relentlessly down their Muslim throats until they absolutely choke on it. That, or the Muslims will triumph in the end by shoving their Islam down our throats until we are the ones left choking and gasping for air. That is the way Islam has come to shackle over a billion slaves so far.

In this specific case, is the suffering of these women sad and deplorable? Of course. But it is of far more import to us that Muslims are furiously and concertedly working across the spectrum to swell their numbers in our land as quickly and ruthlessly as possible. THAT is the portentious critical kernel, the 'takeaway', of this plot. The incidental suffering of a single Muslim woman here or there is immaterial to our fate, if we don't focus on what is important.

Who is encouraging this concerted frenzy to import more and more Muslim men into Dar-al-Harb? Who is coordinating this exploding trend? What is the explanation given, the exhortation made to act thus? Muslims are doing this whether they hail from Pakistan, Egypt, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, or "Palestine".

And they are doing it in Brooklyn, London, Paris, Lackawanna and Lodi. Why?

Learn the answers to these questions, and you'll be closer to understanding the true nature and scope behind their Islamic war against us. This isn't just some quaint barbaric custom from some random primitive culture. It is a broad multi-pronged vanguard war maneuver to swell Islam's ranks behind enemy lines while the infidel enemy remains asleep and confused. JihadWatch should not be fueling that confusion by missing the larger and deadly purport of such stories, or conflating trivial tragedy with sinister widespread Islamic enemy tactics.

THE NATURE OF ISLAM

Adding a new blogger to the roll, we at TBA salute the comprehensive work of Islamic Expansion And Decline. Here is an excerpt refuting a peculiar piece of information the average Islamic zealot himself, even if aware of his own historical underpinnings, nevertheless will refuse to accept not only as reality unblemished by myth, but as also directly related to his own religion's serious constrictions on free and inquisitive thought which have led to such "outbreaks" of greater knowledge, the sciences, and finer works of art:

Chapter 11: The Parasitic Civilization
Islam’s “golden age” and “splendors” is a topic of incessant fascination. It would, of course, be more accurate to speak of Islam’s “golden ages” since there were a number of such intellectual and artistic flowerings. The high civilizations of Abbasid Baghdad and of Moorish Spain, as well as the magnificence of the Ottoman and Mogul courts are well-known.

However, the Muslim efflorescence, like the financial underpinning for the Muslim military campaigns, depended on the wealth expropriated from, and on the continuing economic exploitation of, conquered non-Muslim populations. In addition, it must be acknowledged that the Muslim invaders were not, in general, total barbarians; they were not Huns or Mongols or Vandals. They valued the level of civilization that they encountered in their invasions and maintained a cultivated and often comfortable existence. However, one thing about the historical record is noteworthy; the various golden ages of Islamic civilization always occur early in the first few centuries in which a new territory is occupied. Wherever the various Muslim vanguards invaded, the vast majority of the population was non-Muslim. It would take many years for this population to be converted and assimilated. These non-Muslims or recent converts are the ones who carried on the work which many historians are prone to attribute to "Islamic" civilization. Thus, a distinction must be drawn between the so-called high Islamic civilization and the religion of Islam. Eventually as the process of Islamization proceeds the non-Islamic component of the population becomes a small minority and stagnation sets in. This process is evident in the first centuries of the Arab conquests where the process of Arabization and conversion to Islam took a few centuries to complete; this was the "Arab" golden age, a product of unconverted or recently converted Christians, Jews and Zoroastrians. In Spain the golden age lasted longer, perhaps because the process of Islamization was never as complete in Moorish Spain as in the Arab East.

It is remarkable how closely this pattern was repeated in the subsequent expansions of Islam as a consequence of the Turkish and Mogul conquests. The initial splendors of the Seljuk and Ottoman empires were the result of unconverted or recently converted subjects. When the Islamization of the newly conquered territories was complete intellectual stagnation once again set in. Similarly, an initial flowering as an extension of the ancient Hindu culture followed the Mogul conquest of India.

It must, however, be granted that Islamic civilization did serve a valuable purpose as a bridge between the West and the ancient civilizations of India and China. This resulted in the transmission of science and technology from China and mathematics from India. It must also be noted that, as will be shown below, the so-called Arabic numerals are really Hindu in origin; algebra is a combination of Indian, Greek and pre-Islamic Mesopotamian mathematics. And while it is true that Muslim rulers did enable some of the knowledge of the classical world to be preserved, the importance of this work has been greatly exaggerated. In addition, the actual work of transcribing and preserving this classical knowledge was done by non-Muslims or by recent converts.

Plunder and Economic Exploitation
The first Muslim invaders were always invariably motivated by the desire for loot and, as we have seen in Chapter 7: Culture of the Harem, the lust for concubines. The Prophet himself “skillfully couched his worldly objectives in divine terms” and this “fusion of the sacred and the profitable was endorsed by future generations of Islamic leaders.”[1] Thus, Islamic scripture contains explicit promise of, and religious sanction for, plunder from infidels:

Read it all.