GLADSTONE KNEW IT ALSO

WILLIAM EWART GLADSTONE (1809–1898) was Prime Minister of Great Britain four times: 1868–74, 1880–85, 1886 and 1892–94. He called the Qur'an an "accursed book" and once held it up during a session of Parliament, declaring: "So long as there is this book there will be no peace in the world."

The victorious Hugh Fitzgerald puts it this way:

The Qur'an remains the same. And the Hadith collections by the most authoritative muhaddithin, and the ranking of "authenticity" that they assign to each Hadith in their collections, remain the same. And the details of the life of Muhammad—including the decapitation of the 600-900 prisoners of the Banu Qurayza, the pleasure taken in the killings of Asma bint Marwan and Abu Afak, the raid for women and loot on the inoffensive Jewish farmers of the Khaybar Oasis (who had not "rejected" Muhammad because they hardly knew he and his followers existed, but were attacked nonetheless), the marriage to little Aisha when she was nine, the deception—"war is deceit"—recommended by this, the Perfect Man (al-insan al-kamil) to his followers, so well practiced in his "truce treaty" with the Meccans made in 628 A.D. at Al-Hudaibiyyah—all this remains part of the biography of that Perfect Man.

Thus, Gladstone is added to the list of antiquities, of men of conscience and common decency with names like Jefferson, Adams, Schopenhauer, Churchill, who have investigated the written testimony of Islam, and found it abominable and permanently contrary to the dictates of human dignity.

Nineteenth century German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer did not mince words in opining on the perniciousl nature of Islam:

"Consider, for example, the Koran. This wretched book was sufficient to found a religion of the world, to satisfy the metaphysical need of innumerable millions of men for twelve hundred years, to become the foundation of their morality, and of no small contempt for death, and also to inspire them to bloody wars and most extended conquests. We find in it the saddest and the poorest form of Theism. Much may be lost through the translations ; but I have not been able to discover one single valuable thought in it."

...while the ruthless Adolph Hitler, in all his bloody wisdom, had this to say:

“The Mohammedan religion…would have been much more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?”

And this from Teddy Roosevelt:

Christianity is not the creed of Asia and Africa at this moment solely because the seventh century Christians of Asia and Africa had trained themselves not to fight, whereas the Moslems were trained to fight.

Christianity was saved in Europe solely because the peoples of Europe fought. If the peoples of Europe in the seventh and eighth centuries, an on up to and including the seventeenth century, had not possessed a military equality with, and gradually a growing superiority over the Mohammedans who invaded Europe, Europe would at this moment be Mohammedan and the Christian religion would be exterminated.

Wherever the Mohammedans have had complete sway, wherever the Christians have been unable to resist them by the sword, Christianity has ultimately disappeared. From the hammer of Charles Martel to the sword of Jan Sobieski, Christianity owed its safety in Europe to the fact that it was able to show that it could and would fight as well as the Mohammedan aggressor.

The civilization of Europe, American and Australia exists today at all only because of the victories of civilized man over the enemies of civilization because of victories through the centuries from Charles Martel in the eighth century and those of John Sobieski in the seventeenth century. During the thousand years that included the careers of the Frankish soldier and the Polish king, the Christians of Asia and Africa proved unable to wage successful war with the Moslem conquerors; and in consequence Christianity practically vanished from the two continents; and today, nobody can find in them any "social values" whatever, in the sense in which we use the words, so far as the sphere of Mohammedan influences are concerned.

There are such "social values" today in Europe, America and Australia only because during those thousand years, the Christians of Europe possessed the warlike power to do what the Christians of Asia and Africa had failed to do—that is, to beat back the Moslem invader.

And just for kicks, shall we revisit Sir Winston Churchill's verdict on the eery similarity between the Nazis and the Muslims:

"In truth though, just as the British stoicism recalls the same from 65 years ago, so too, there is a deep and instructive similarity between the Nazis and the Islamic-fascist forces that attacked then and attack today. The fact of the matter is that even more important than invoking the famous British "stiff upper lip," to fight this current war to victory requires understanding and accepting the similarities between the Nazis and the Arab-Islamic terrorist armies."

CHINA CRACKS DOWN ON ISLAM

(AHN) - The Chinese government is attempting to limit prayer time and areas of worship for practicing Muslims in the northwestern part of the nation, which some see as an effort to control the growth of Islam. Posted signs outside some mosques reportedly direct Muslims not to go longer than one half-hour in prayer and also not to pray outside of them, as well.

Khotan residents are also prohibited from worshipping at moques outside of their town, reportedly angering some citizens. People who are upset with the rules do not express their concerns, however, for fear of retribution from the government. China's rules on Islam stretch from public into other facets of life, as well, as only official versions of the Qur'an are acceptable to use and Imams are forbidden from teaching from the book in private.

Read these comments on the topic.

WHICH ISLAM IS HIJACKED?

Well, it can be said that Christianity has been hijacked by millions of apathetic backsliders, and it can be said that millions of fundy Christians upset our secular notions, and and it can also be said that neo-cons who wish to test a few new weapons usually go out hunting for rabbits, but every time the dusty-breathed Mohammedans sit up and take notice of the world, like the groundhog, only when corporeal power is once again in their camp, this is ALWAYS the result.

Nearly 1400 years of history attest to these facts. So what are we as a civilization to do. The Mohammedans are indeed on the march again thanks to billions of petrodollars in some circles and have a population explosion across most of their lands, so much so they export people as fast as they can export their vulgar religion with brand new mosques to train them in the "perfect" ways of Mohammed the plunderer.

Thanks to Eric the Kuffar who posted this on Jihad Watch:

1. Infidels are your sworn enemies (Sura 4:101).
2. Be ruthless to the infidels (Sura 48:29).
3. Make war on the infidels who dwell around you (Sura 9:123, 66:9).
4. Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day (Sura 9:29).
5. Strike off the heads of infidels in battle (Sura 47:4).
6. If someone stops believing in Allah, kill him (al-Bukhari 9:84:57).
7. Take neither the Jews nor the Christians for your friends (Sura 5:51, 60:13).
8. Never be a helper to the disbelievers (Sura 28:86).
9. Kill the disbelievers wherever we find them (Sura 2:191).
10. No Muslim should be killed for killing an infidel (al-Bukhari 1:3:111).
11. The only reward of those who make war upon Allah and His messenger will be that they will be killed or crucified, or have their hands and feet on alternate sides cut off, or will be expelled out of the land (Sura 5:33).
12. I shall terrorize the infidels. So wound their bodies and incapacitate them because they oppose Allah and His Apostle. (Qur'an:8:12)
13. Allah's Apostle said, 'I have been made victorious with terror.' (al Bukhari: 4:52:220)

End of Sermon on the Mount

IN THE PROVERBIAL NUTSHELL

The new Geert Wilders movie about Islam is about to make its appearance. The Netherlands is hunkering down waiting for the inevitable backlash. Wilders insists that his film will prove once and for all that the Koran is a fascist book, a piece of writing filthy with violence and incitements to kill until the objectives of which it espouses are met.

A few comments by a former soldier known here as Sergeant Brown:

The film will be a re-enforcement of know fact. The followers of the Qur'an provide you with a daily dose of fact by their actions. They lie, rape, murder, maim, intimidate, extort, and vandalize and scandalize, then they quote passages from the Qur'an as justification for their actions. And it is not "just a few isolated extremists who have hijacked a religion" as some will tell you. They are in almost every country constantly probing for weak people, weak security, and other weaknesses they can exploit to their benefit. They thrive on the "fear factor" of terror. They have discovered "fear works".

In almost every case of terrorism by Islamic jihadists where ever it occurs you will find a mosque nearby—and in almost every case it is discovered the terrorists attended the mosque—and they quote passages from the Qur'an.

The terrorists filter in from almost every Muslim country—some come in legally (really easy to in countries with lax immigration rules), others slip in illegally (really easy to do in countries with lax border security)—and you will often see Islamic clerics giving hate speeches and threatening violence prior to an actual attack—often , just prior to the attack, the clerics will make demands for special priviledges for Muslims (you must do this—you must do that.) Or demand the host government remove its support for fighting terrorism from those who are trying to fight terrorism. The terrorists quickly warn the host country that suicide bombers and other violent acts will occur soon if their demands are not met....

In the possession of terrorists killed in attacks on innocent people you will often find:

a) a Koran;
b) hate documents inspired by the Koran;
c) indications of travel and/or training in a Muslim country (often Pakistan, Iran, Syria, Yemen, or Egypt);
d) photos of now dead marytrs who succeeded in killing infidels;
e) newspaper clippings of violent incidents caused when some infidel dropped a Koran, improperly touched a Koran, supposedly made some perceived insulting remark about a Koran, or published an inspired cartoon depicting Muslims as they truly are (a violent people) or made a film showing how Muslims treat its women or its "followers", or of some judicial success stories when Muslims sue businesses or employers for perceived injustices (i.e. profiling, discriminating, or display of anti-Islamic sentiments)...

It becomes clearer every day that the Qur'an inspires violence—and the Muslims are proud to quote from it—and they do it often—far too often to allow it to be sold in stores, displayed in schools, or even allowed in non-Muslim countries.

You seldom see any books banned in western countries—but go to a Muslim countries and visit a bookstore and see if you can find good books about the Bible or of Biblical history. See if you can find Moby Dick, Tale of Two Cities, or any number or great classical books. See if you can find books written about the Crusades. See if you can find books about the great inventors of the world. See if you can find books about the cultures and histories of the western worlds or of its scientists or doctors...

Islam bans many books. We should ban at least one—the Qur'an—it is evil.

Thanks, Sarge. Now, YOU be the judge. If you're still not convinced, but require a more convincing audio and visual aid in fathoming this assault on your fine senses, try this clip. And please, prepare yourselves and your loved ones with the proper knowledge needed to fight this coming threat better than our leaders are preparing the nation. For what is happening in Europe, or Eurabia today, and in hotspots elsewhere around the globe, is on its way to a neighborhood near you, if things don't change at the top, and we learn to not only recognize and name our enemy, but wholeheartedly resolve to soundly defeat it.

MUSLIMS AGAINST SHARIA

The Muslims Against Sharia site appears legitimate, and should it prove to be so, that is, a site erected, maintained, and supported by a growing number of inspired Muslim leaders, indeed would be uplifting news, an excellent supplement to that long-elusive manifestation of concerted actions required to force Islam to meet the West on a sound and logical footing, joining the company of a few other strong and courageous voices out there contradicting the usual "Religion of Peace" deception fed the infidels, such as Islamwatch, another site created by and for ex-Muslims.

While we can apprerciate both the perceived and the real threats of dangerous blowback, even the threat of death to [reformation-minded] apostates and blasphemers of the Muslim faith, those Muslims who speak out against these pernicious doctrines and problems facing Islam today, placing the responsibility of reform squarely upon Muslim shoulders, can only invigorate our call for more strong voices like these to step forward out of the shadows of Dar Al-Islam to help turn the tide of Islamic aggression operating with extreme prejudice in the world today.

Here is an excerpt from the manifesto published on the Muslims Against Sharia homepage:

The need for reform
Islam, in its present form, is not compatible with principles of freedom and democracy. Twenty-first century Muslims have two options: we can continue the barbaric policies of the seventh century perpetuated by Hassan al-Banna, Abdullah Azzam, Yassir Arafat, Ruhollah Khomeini, Osama bin Laden, Muslim Brotherhood, al-Qaeda, Hizballah, Hamas, Hizb-ut-Tahrir, etc., leading to a global war between Dar al-Islam (Islamic World) and Dar al-Harb (non-Islamic World), or we can reform Islam to keep our rich cultural heritage and to cleanse our religion from the reviled relics of the past. We, as Muslims who desire to live in harmony with people of other religions, agnostics, and atheists choose the latter option. We can no longer allow Islamic extremists to use our religion as a weapon. We must protect future generations of Muslims from being brainwashed by the Islamic radicals. If we do not stop the spread of Islamic fundamentalism, our children will become homicidal zombies.

Accepting responsibilities
To start the healing process, we must acknowledge evils done by Muslims in the name of Islam and accept responsibility for those evils. We must remove evil passages from Islamic religious texts, so that future generations of Muslims will not be confused by conflicting messages. Our religious message should be loud and clear: Islam is peace; Islam is love; Islam is light. War, murder, violence, divisiveness & discrimination are not Islamic values.

Religious privacy
Religion is the private matter of every individual. Any person should be able to freely practice any religion as long as the practice does not interfere with the local laws, and no person must be forced to practice any religion. Just as people are created equal, there is no one religion that is superior to another. Any set of beliefs that is spread by force is fundamentally immoral; it is no longer a religion, but a political ideology.

Equality
Islam is one of the many of the world's religions. There will be no Peace and Harmony in the World if Muslims and non-Muslims do not have equal rights. Islamic supremacy doctrine is just as repulsive as Aryan supremacy doctrine. History clearly shows what happens to the society whose members consider themselves above other peoples. All moderate Muslims must repudiate the mere notion of Islamic supremacy.

Sharia
Sharia Law must be abolished, because it is incompatible with norms of modern society.

Outdated practices
Any practices that might have been acceptable in the Seventh Century; i.e., stoning, cutting off body parts, marrying and/or having sex with children or animals, must be condemned by every Muslim.

Outdated verses
The following verses promote divisiveness and religious hatred, bigotry and discrimination. They must be either removed from the Koran or declared outdated and invalid, and marked as such.

Outdated words & phrases
Use of the following words and phrases or their variations must be prohibited during religious services:
• Infidel/Unbeliever: these terms have negative connotation and promote divisiveness and animosity; Islam is not the only religion
• Jihad: this word is often interpreted as Holy War against non-Muslims
• Mujaheed/Holy Warrior: no more wars in the name of Islam
• American (Christian/Crusader/Israeli/Zionist) occupation: these terms promote bigotry; at this point in time, Muslims living in non-Muslim lands have more freedoms than Muslims living in Muslim lands

Read it all...

Post-script (November 12, 2009): Muslims Against Sharia has been shown to be a fraudulent site. Beware of them, even as they push moderate propaganda that sounds reasonable to Western ears, but as more than a few other anti-jihadist commentators can attest, should one disagree in any way with the proprietors, the MAS spokesmen turn adolescently vulgar, scatalogical and vicious, ad hominem and void of ideas, unbecoming of the civilized allies of the West they pretend to be.