In Great Britain where the euphemism for Muslims causing trouble is enlarged in declaring them Asian (since many of the British Muslims are of Pakistani roots), here's more astounding behavioral malfeasance by young Mohammedan thugs who like to play hard and they play for keeps. Thanks Fred for the clip:
There is a serious problem in the North of England with our disadvantaged “Asian” (apologies to the Chinese and Indians) ripping off motor insurance. I could fill pages of cases but essentially a car load of Asians target a lone white person and at an opportune moment cause an “accident”. The victim is then confronted by four men saying it is their fault and screaming at them for their for their stupidity. If four is not enough mobiles are then used to summon up even more “cousins”.
A relative who was hit on a supermarket carpark found herself surrounded by first four and then about 12 men, which for a slightly built school teacher of 60 was quite unpleasant. The only people to offer help were a group of English students one of whom quietly approached her and said they would wait and watch until she was able to leave. With that number of “witnesses” she had no hope and it cost her £3000 which was not a bad hours work for the Asians.
The new Geert Wilders movie about Islam is about to make its appearance. The Netherlands is hunkering down waiting for the inevitable backlash. Wilders insists that his film will prove once and for all that the Koran is a fascist book, a piece of writing filthy with violence and incitements to kill until the objectives of which it espouses are met.
A few comments by a former soldier known here as Sergeant Brown:
The film will be a re-enforcement of know fact. The followers of the Qur'an provide you with a daily dose of fact by their actions. They lie, rape, murder, maim, intimidate, extort, and vandalize and scandalize, then they quote passages from the Qur'an as justification for their actions. And it is not "just a few isolated extremists who have hijacked a religion" as some will tell you. They are in almost every country constantly probing for weak people, weak security, and other weaknesses they can exploit to their benefit. They thrive on the "fear factor" of terror. They have discovered "fear works".
In almost every case of terrorism by Islamic jihadists where ever it occurs you will find a mosque nearbyand in almost every case it is discovered the terrorists attended the mosqueand they quote passages from the Qur'an.
The terrorists filter in from almost every Muslim countrysome come in legally (really easy to in countries with lax immigration rules), others slip in illegally (really easy to do in countries with lax border security)and you will often see Islamic clerics giving hate speeches and threatening violence prior to an actual attackoften , just prior to the attack, the clerics will make demands for special priviledges for Muslims (you must do thisyou must do that.) Or demand the host government remove its support for fighting terrorism from those who are trying to fight terrorism. The terrorists quickly warn the host country that suicide bombers and other violent acts will occur soon if their demands are not met....
In the possession of terrorists killed in attacks on innocent people you will often find:
a) a Koran; b) hate documents inspired by the Koran; c) indications of travel and/or training in a Muslim country (often Pakistan, Iran, Syria, Yemen, or Egypt); d) photos of now dead marytrs who succeeded in killing infidels; e) newspaper clippings of violent incidents caused when some infidel dropped a Koran, improperly touched a Koran, supposedly made some perceived insulting remark about a Koran, or published an inspired cartoon depicting Muslims as they truly are (a violent people) or made a film showing how Muslims treat its women or its "followers", or of some judicial success stories when Muslims sue businesses or employers for perceived injustices (i.e. profiling, discriminating, or display of anti-Islamic sentiments)...
It becomes clearer every day that the Qur'an inspires violenceand the Muslims are proud to quote from itand they do it oftenfar too often to allow it to be sold in stores, displayed in schools, or even allowed in non-Muslim countries.
You seldom see any books banned in western countriesbut go to a Muslim countries and visit a bookstore and see if you can find good books about the Bible or of Biblical history. See if you can find Moby Dick, Tale of Two Cities, or any number or great classical books. See if you can find books written about the Crusades. See if you can find books about the great inventors of the world. See if you can find books about the cultures and histories of the western worlds or of its scientists or doctors...
Islam bans many books. We should ban at least onethe Qur'anit is evil.
Thanks, Sarge. Now, YOU be the judge. If you're still not convinced, but require a more convincing audio and visual aid in fathoming this assault on your fine senses, try this clip. And please, prepare yourselves and your loved ones with the proper knowledge needed to fight this coming threat better than our leaders are preparing the nation. For what is happening in Europe, or Eurabia today, and in hotspots elsewhere around the globe, is on its way to a neighborhood near you, if things don't change at the top, and we learn to not only recognize and name our enemy, but wholeheartedly resolve to soundly defeat it.
Only one thing will work. Not appeals to common sense, intelligence, morality, the truth. Not stuff like that. If the company that owns the billboard believes it will suffer, not necessarily through its billboard rental business, but in other ways, in other businesses it may own, and if it calculates that its losses will outweigh any "gain" from not offending Muslims and Arabs (including those with that oil wealth successive American governments have not done a thing to diminishpleading as Bush did for lower prices merely causes them to believe that we believe that they hold all the cards, when of course if things were understood properly, it is we who hold them, beginning with the ability to make oil just as expensive, through taxation, as we wish, and thereby to diminish demand, and ending with their complete reliance on the Western world for medical care, education, advanced technology, weaponry, the defense of their assorted "royal" families, and so on)...
Make the owner aware that there will be consequences.
And here's another thought...
All American patriots must come to the realization that every second or third generation will have to sacrifice dearly for life and liberty, or it will be lost. The enemy we now face is no different in essence than the British Empire that we faced in 1776, or the Nazi enemy we faced in WWII. The American Revolution is not over yet, and we still must either defend ourselves from all enemies of our God-given liberty, both home and abroad; or give in to tyranny and terror. It is time to re-declare our Declaration of Independence.
As always, in this battle against moral relativism, the always astute Hugh Fitzgerald from Jihad Watch separates the sticks from the stones in this reply to a self-proclaimed moderate Palestinian named Ibrahim who preaches from the old tired playbook of the eternal victim Muslims have adopted in their war of taqiyya against the West in general and against Israel in particular. Revisionism trumps the facts in their playbook. Mr. Fitzgerald's rather keen elucidation against the blurring of the facts speaks for itself.
Quite a few atheists in this particular foxhole, Ibrahim. But atheists who happen to know the history of the treatment, or mistreatment, of Jews and other non-Muslim (and non-Arab) minorities in the Middle East. Atheists who know the history of the Jews, including what happened in "Palestine" after the Muslim invasion. Atheists willing to do research into the cadastral (land ownership) records, and the demographic records, of that dusty part of the Ottoman Empire that, split between several vilayets and the separate sanjak of Jerusalem, did not have more than 100,000 people in the mid-19th century, with 15,000 in Jerusalema plurality of them, even then, Jews.
Atheists who know perfectly well why Lloyd George, Clemenceau, Jan Christiaan Smuts, and others who founded the League of Nations found it right, found it proper, found it just, to establish, among the various mandates (four Arab countries came out of those mandates, while the Kurds and the Armenians never had the promises made to them fulfilled, and the Jews received a dimidiated territoryonly historic "Palestine" west of the Jordan and that, of course, is precisely the territory that you know perfectly well, sir, the Arabs and Muslims have no intention of letting the Israelis permanently possess, no matter how many further territorial and other absurd concessions the Israelis, whose entire negotiating history for the past 59 years has been to give up, give up, give up, tangible gains for promises that are always and everywhere eventually breached, for those who follow the Treaty of Al Hudaibiyya (and as Majid Khadduri points out in "War and Peace in Islam" all Muslims follow Muhammad's example in that treaty, the 10-year hudna with the Meccans, broken by him after 18 months).
Yes, there are plenty of atheists, Protestants and Catholics too, and Hindus and Buddhists, and would you believe it? even Muslims of the Muslim-for-identification-purposes-only variety, and certainly every apostate I have ever met, who are deeply worried about, concerned about, and refuse to contemplate any further surrenders to the Lesser Jihad that will forever be conducted against it, the State of Israel.
Not everyone, contrary to your silly stereotype, is a holy-roller Bible-thumper who supports Israel. In fact, it only takes two things. It takes specific historical knowledge, and moral sense. And even if you lack that knowledge, and that sense, and all you know is that any further triumphs by Arab Muslims, either by pressuring Israel into still more idiotic and dangerous concessions, or by accepting the Arab narrative that attempts to disguise the Lesser Jihad as a "nationalist struggle" of that recently-invented (circa late 1967) "Palestinian people" (see Zohair Mohsen on this), will only whet, not sate, the Muslim appetite. In other words, all you have to know, now, if you are a non-Muslim, is that any concession, anywhere, to Msulim demands by any non-Muslim people or state, will be bad for all non-Muslims.
That is what many Infidels are coming to recognize. And in so doing, all the hard work of all those Arab, Muslim, and "Palestinian" propagandists over the past forty years is coming unravelled, coming undone.
Four years, perhaps out in little more than one year. That's the prognosis for the Paki-bred UK dentist who decided to take up arms against the British to avenge his Muslim brothers of the Taliban.
He claimed he was going to visit his family for the Islamic festival of Eid. Qureshi is the first to be convicted under new legislation targeting the preparation of terrorist acts. He was held after a joint operation involving Scotland Yard's Counter Terrorism Command and the Security Services. Investigations revealed Qureshi offered to help the war effort in Pakistan and Afghanistan. An intercept communication revealed him telling one of his contacts: "All I know is it's a two- to three-week operation. Pray that I kill many."
Qureshi pleaded guilty to preparing for the commission of terrorist acts, possession of articles for terrorist purposes and possession of articles likely to be useful to terrorists...
The biggest joke of the new year is that you can now, in Britain, be sentenced to seven years for "religious hatred". One doesn't actually have to do anything overtly (or even covertly), one just has to show hatred towards a religion (Islam mainly). And the US Congress is considering similar legislation on their docket. So basically a flag waving native son can receive a longer sentence for a thought crime against Islam than an Islamist continues to receive for attempting to go and murder the citizens of your host nation.
A fast-tracked congressional plan to add special protections for homosexuals to federal law would turn "thoughts, feelings, and beliefs" into criminal offenses and put Christians in the bull's-eye, according to opponents.
"H.R. 1592 is a discriminatory measure that criminalizes thoughts, feelings, and beliefs [and] has the potential of interfering with religious liberty and freedom of speech," according to a white paper submitted by Glen Lavy, of the Alliance Defense Fund.
"As James Jacobs and Kimberly Potter observed in Hate Crimes, Criminal Law, and Identity Politics, 'It would appear that the only additional purpose [for enhancing punishment of bias crimes] is to provide extra punishment based on the offender's politically incorrect opinions and viewpoints,'" said Lavy. The proposal has been endorsed by majority Democrats on the committee, and already has 137 sponsors in the full House, making it possible it could be voted on in a matter of days or weeks.
Get out the little red book, the Communists are truly in power.
The Augur (pl: augures) was a priest and official in ancient Rome. His main
role was to take auspices: interpreting the will of the gods by studying the flight of the birds (flying in groups or alone,
what noises they make as they fly, direction of flight and what kind of birds they are), known as "taking the auspices."
The ceremony and function of the augur was central to any major undertaking in Roman societypublic or privateincluding
matters of war, commerce, and religion. In the context of global unrest in my generationI am sometimes peace activist, but more often an entrenched war correspondent.
"Still, if you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed;
if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly; you may come to the
moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival.
"There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope
of victory, because it is better to perish than live as slaves."
Winston Churchill, 1948
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, who's face is marred by dust and sweat and blood.
Who knows the greatest enthusiasm, the great devotion and sends himself into a worthy cause. Who at best, if he
winsknows the thrill of high achievement, and if he failsat least fails while bearing greatness. So that his
place shall never be, with those cold and timid souls, who know neither victory nor defeat."
Theodore Roosevelt
"Today the hatred of the Moslem countries against the West is becoming hatred against Christianity itself.
Although the statesmen have not yet taken it into account, there is still grave danger that the temporal power
of Islam may return and, with it, the menace that it may shake off a West which has ceased to be
Christian, and affirm itself as a great anti-Christian world Power."
Bishop Fulton J. Sheen, 1950
“Islam was not a torch, as has been claimed, but an extinguisher. Conceived in a barbarous brain for the
use of a barbarous people, it wasand it remainsincapable of adapting itself to civilization. Wherever
it has dominated, it has broken the impulse towards progress and checked the evolution of society.”
Andre Servier, 1922
“Islam is an absurd theology of an immoral Bedouin, a rotting corpse which poisons our lives."
Kemal Ataturk, 1919
"The mosques are our barracks, the domes our helmets, the minarets our bayonets and the faithful our soldiers".
Tayyip Erdogan, 2007
"I have been made victorious through terror."
Muhammad, founder of Islam
“Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Koran, the Muslim book of scripture, should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth.”
Omar Ahmad, founder of CAIR
"Ignorance and virtue suck on the same straw."
Icarus Tull, 1984
“Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance.
If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant,
if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the
onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed,
and tolerance with them… We should therefore claim, in the name
of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim
that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law,
and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal,
in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping,
or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal.”