Thursday, April 17, 2008

GETTING ALONG SWIMMINGLY

A SWIMMING POOL CONTROVERSY over in Hackney neighborhood of London is in the news.

I'm only surprised that anyone is surprised by this. This is Islam—gender and religious apartheid in action, and endless, arrogant demands and appropriation of infidel territory. It won't ever stop unless it is stopped by force. Islam knows no limitations except those of "necessity", so the more it is accommodated, the more it will take.

With each passing year, and with greater and greater Muslim immigration, situations like this will become more frequent, and the *community* atmosphere more and more tense.

Islam ALWAYS expropriates. It NEVER reciprocates.

And why, indeed, should it? Why reciprocate to individuals who are seen as utterly worthless subhumans? This situation is the natural and entirely expected result of allowing a bunch of supremacist/chauvinist bile to divide, unopposed, all of mankind into a pure/impure group dichotomy. Furthermore, this view, unfortunately is embraced by both islamist extremists and large numbers of so-called moderates, the wolves in sheep's clothing.

Many on the Left are confused and knocked off-balance because this new form of vicious "Far Right" is not based on the usual, obvious and time-worn criteria, that of skin tone. How easy and straightforward things used to be. And what a hoot to watch hospitable anti-fascist thinkers flounder and flail, incapable, as they are, of extracting the salient points of a chauvinistic and fascistic mind-set, and completely unable, thus, to recognise, stop and effectively rollback the new Naziism. Islam is just National Socialism—kicked up a notch.

It is not 'abrahamaic, it is not 'religion', it is not divinely ordained; it is merely the ongoing expression of a hate-filled, steal-the-loot ideology, as concocted by a murderous, desert brigand. It deserves our contempt, not our respect.

One can either live in a liberal democracy with secular, universal standards (of public accomodation, among all else) or not. Clearly, many soft Leftists think there must be some sort of third way.

Labels: , , , ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home